Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-GGUF vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Try Try

Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-GGUF has 27.3B parameters (25.6B active per token) and takes 10.4 GB on disk; Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has 180B and takes 360 GB. Compare them layer by layer.

At a glance

ISTA-DASLab/Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-GGUFQwen/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Repo createdAug 28, 2026updated Sep 2, 2026Aug 24, 2026updated Aug 27, 2026
Model typeDenseHybrid attention: 48 linear + 17 full (GQA)Not shown: breakdown incomplete
InputsText + imagesvision encoder in a separate mmproj file, not counted hereText + images449M vision encoder
Total parameters27.3B6.6× less180B6.6× more
Active per token25.6B94% of the modelNot shown: breakdown incomplete
ExpertsNone (dense)Not shown: breakdown incomplete
Max context (from config)256K tokenssame256K tokenssame
Layers641.3× more48 linear + 17 full attention · plus 1 extra prediction layer481.3× less36 linear + 12 full attention
On disk10.4 GB35× less1 file360 GB35× more131 files
PrecisionIQ3_S (22%), IQ3_XXS (20%), IQ2_S (19%), IQ4_XS (14%), Q2_K (6.0%), IQ2_XS (5.9%), IQ2_XXS (5.4%), Q4_K (3.7%), Q6_K (3.3%), other (1.3%)BF16 (100%)
QuantizationIQ3_XXS (GGUF)mix of IQ2_S, IQ3_XXS, IQ3_S +6 more · blocks of 256 · 100% of parametersNoneoriginal precision (BF16)
Fewest GPUs1× RTX 3060 12 GBa single 12 GB card · weights only5× NVIDIA H100fits in one 8-GPU server · weights only
Licenseapache-2.0qwen-community-1.0 (custom)
GitHubNot linkedQwenLM/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next