Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-GGUF vs NeoHorse-1-9B

Try Try

Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-GGUF has 27.3B parameters (25.6B active per token) and takes 10.4 GB on disk; NeoHorse-1-9B has 8.95B (7.94B active) and takes 17.9 GB. Compare them layer by layer.

At a glance

ISTA-DASLab/Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-GGUFTokenRhythm/NeoHorse-1-9B
Repo createdAug 28, 2026updated Sep 2, 2026Sep 5, 2026updated Sep 10, 2026
Model typeDenseHybrid attention: 48 linear + 17 full (GQA)DenseHybrid attention: 24 linear + 8 full (GQA)
InputsText + imagesvision encoder in a separate mmproj file, not counted hereText
Total parameters27.3B3.1× more8.95B3.1× less
Active per token25.6B3.2× more94% of the model7.94B3.2× less89% of the model
ExpertsNone (dense)None (dense)
Max context (from config)256K tokenssame256K tokenssame
Layers642.0× more48 linear + 17 full attention · plus 1 extra prediction layer322.0× less24 linear + 8 full attention
On disk10.4 GB1.7× less1 file17.9 GB1.7× more4 files
PrecisionIQ3_S (22%), IQ3_XXS (20%), IQ2_S (19%), IQ4_XS (14%), Q2_K (6.0%), IQ2_XS (5.9%), IQ2_XXS (5.4%), Q4_K (3.7%), Q6_K (3.3%), other (1.3%)BF16 (100%)
QuantizationIQ3_XXS (GGUF)mix of IQ2_S, IQ3_XXS, IQ3_S +6 more · blocks of 256 · 100% of parametersNoneoriginal precision (BF16)
Fewest GPUs1× RTX 3060 12 GBa single 12 GB card · weights only1× RTX 4090a single 24 GB card · weights only
Licenseapache-2.0apache-2.0
GitHubNot linkedTokenRhythm/NeoHorse