Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-GGUF vs Xing4.0-29B-A4B

Try Try

Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-GGUF has 27.3B parameters (25.6B active per token) and takes 10.4 GB on disk; Xing4.0-29B-A4B has 31.2B (3.93B active) and takes 62.4 GB. Compare them layer by layer.

At a glance

ISTA-DASLab/Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-GGUFXingChen-AGI/Xing4.0-29B-A4B
Repo createdAug 28, 2026updated Sep 2, 2026Sep 16, 2026updated Sep 18, 2026
Model typeDenseHybrid attention: 48 linear + 17 full (GQA)Mixture of expertsFull attention (MLA)
InputsText + imagesvision encoder in a separate mmproj file, not counted hereText
Total parameters27.3B1.1× less31.2B1.1× more
Active per token25.6B6.5× more94% of the model3.93B6.5× less13% of the model
ExpertsNone (dense)4 of 64 activeplus 1 shared, always on
Max context (from config)256K tokenssame256K tokenssame
Layers641.6× more48 linear + 17 full attention · plus 1 extra prediction layer401.6× lessplus 1 extra prediction layer
On disk10.4 GB6.0× less1 file62.4 GB6.0× more41 files
PrecisionIQ3_S (22%), IQ3_XXS (20%), IQ2_S (19%), IQ4_XS (14%), Q2_K (6.0%), IQ2_XS (5.9%), IQ2_XXS (5.4%), Q4_K (3.7%), Q6_K (3.3%), other (1.3%)BF16 (100%)
QuantizationIQ3_XXS (GGUF)mix of IQ2_S, IQ3_XXS, IQ3_S +6 more · blocks of 256 · 100% of parametersNoneoriginal precision (BF16)
Fewest GPUs1× RTX 3060 12 GBa single 12 GB card · weights only1× NVIDIA H100a single 80 GB card · weights only
Licenseapache-2.0apache-2.0
GitHubNot linkedXingChen-AGI/Xing4.0-29B-A4B