Qwen3-32B vs NeoHorse-1-9B

Try Try

Qwen3-32B has 32.8B parameters (32.0B active per token) and takes 65.5 GB on disk; NeoHorse-1-9B has 8.95B (7.94B active) and takes 17.9 GB. Compare them layer by layer.

At a glance

Qwen/Qwen3-32BTokenRhythm/NeoHorse-1-9B
Repo createdApr 27, 2025updated Jul 26, 2025Sep 5, 2026updated Sep 10, 2026
Model typeDenseFull attention (GQA)DenseHybrid attention: 24 linear + 8 full (GQA)
InputsTextText
Total parameters32.8B3.7× more8.95B3.7× less
Active per token32.0B4.0× more98% of the model7.94B4.0× less89% of the model
ExpertsNone (dense)None (dense)
Max context (from config)40K tokens6.4× less256K tokens6.4× more
Layers642.0× more322.0× less24 linear + 8 full attention
On disk65.5 GB3.7× more17 files17.9 GB3.7× less4 files
PrecisionBF16 (100%)BF16 (100%)
QuantizationNoneoriginal precision (BF16)Noneoriginal precision (BF16)
Fewest GPUs1× NVIDIA H100a single 80 GB card · weights only1× RTX 4090a single 24 GB card · weights only
Licenseapache-2.0apache-2.0
GitHubQwenLM/Qwen3TokenRhythm/NeoHorse