Qwen3-32B vs jina-ocr-v1

Try Try

Qwen3-32B has 32.8B parameters (32.0B active per token) and takes 65.5 GB on disk; jina-ocr-v1 has 3.37B (708M active) and takes 6.74 GB. Compare them layer by layer.

At a glance

Qwen/Qwen3-32Bjinaai/jina-ocr-v1
Repo createdApr 27, 2025updated Jul 26, 2025Sep 1, 2026updated Sep 18, 2026
Model typeDenseFull attention (GQA)Mixture of expertsFull attention (MHA)
InputsTextText + images303M vision encoder
Total parameters32.8B9.7× more3.37B9.7× less
Active per token32.0B45× more98% of the model708M45× less21% of the model
ExpertsNone (dense)6 of 64 activeplus 2 shared, always on
Max context (from config)40K tokens1.2× more32K tokens1.2× less
Layers645.3× more125.3× less
On disk65.5 GB9.7× more17 files6.74 GB9.7× less2 files
PrecisionBF16 (100%)BF16 (100%)
QuantizationNoneoriginal precision (BF16)Noneoriginal precision (BF16)
Fewest GPUs1× NVIDIA H100a single 80 GB card · weights only1× RTX 4060a single 8 GB card · weights only
Licenseapache-2.0cc-by-nc-4.0
GitHubQwenLM/Qwen3Not linked