Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-GGUF

Try Try

Qwen3.5-2B has 2.27B parameters (1.94B active per token) and takes 4.55 GB on disk; Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-GGUF has 27.3B (25.6B active) and takes 10.4 GB. Compare them layer by layer.

At a glance

Qwen/Qwen3.5-2BISTA-DASLab/Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Repo createdFeb 28, 2026updated Mar 2, 2026Aug 28, 2026updated Sep 2, 2026
Model typeDenseHybrid attention: 18 linear + 6 full (GQA)DenseHybrid attention: 48 linear + 17 full (GQA)
InputsText + images331M vision encoderText + imagesvision encoder in a separate mmproj file, not counted here
Total parameters2.27B12× less27.3B12× more
Active per token1.94B13× less85% of the model25.6B13× more94% of the model
ExpertsNone (dense)None (dense)
Max context (from config)256K tokenssame256K tokenssame
Layers242.7× less18 linear + 6 full attention642.7× more48 linear + 17 full attention · plus 1 extra prediction layer
On disk4.55 GB2.3× less1 file10.4 GB2.3× more1 file
PrecisionBF16 (100%)IQ3_S (22%), IQ3_XXS (20%), IQ2_S (19%), IQ4_XS (14%), Q2_K (6.0%), IQ2_XS (5.9%), IQ2_XXS (5.4%), Q4_K (3.7%), Q6_K (3.3%), other (1.3%)
QuantizationNoneoriginal precision (BF16)IQ3_XXS (GGUF)mix of IQ2_S, IQ3_XXS, IQ3_S +6 more · blocks of 256 · 100% of parameters
Fewest GPUs1× RTX 4060a single 8 GB card · weights only1× RTX 3060 12 GBa single 12 GB card · weights only
Licenseapache-2.0apache-2.0
GitHubNot linkedNot linked