Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8 vs Swift-Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF

Try Try

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8 has 36.0B parameters (3.01B active per token) and takes 37.5 GB on disk; Swift-Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF has 27.3B (25.6B active) and takes 18.0 GB. Compare them layer by layer.

At a glance

Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8ukisai/Swift-Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF
Repo createdApr 15, 2026updated Apr 24, 2026Sep 11, 2026updated Sep 16, 2026
Model typeMixture of expertsHybrid attention: 30 linear + 10 full (GQA)DenseHybrid attention: 48 linear + 17 full (GQA)
InputsText + images447M vision encoderText + imagesvision encoder in a separate mmproj file, not counted here
Total parameters36.0B1.3× more27.3B1.3× less
Active per token3.01B8.5× less8.4% of the model25.6B8.5× more94% of the model
Experts8 of 256 activeplus 1 shared, always onNone (dense)
Max context (from config)256K tokenssame256K tokenssame
Layers401.6× less30 linear + 10 full attention641.6× more48 linear + 17 full attention · plus 1 extra prediction layer
On disk37.5 GB2.1× more42 files18.0 GB2.1× less1 file
PrecisionFP8 E4M3 (92%), BF16 (8.0%)Q4_K (54%), Q6_K (45%), other (0.89%)
QuantizationFP8 E4M3blocks of 128×128 · 96% of parameters · embeddings & output head and vision encoder kept in BF16Q4_K_M (GGUF)mix of Q4_K, Q6_K · blocks of 256 · 100% of parameters
Fewest GPUs1× RTX 6000 Adaa single 48 GB card · weights only1× RTX 4090a single 24 GB card · weights only
Licenseapache-2.0swift-open-license-1.0 (custom)
GitHubNot linkedNot linked