Qwen3.8-27B-MLX-8bit vs Swift-Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF

Try Try

Qwen3.8-27B-MLX-8bit has 27.4B parameters (25.6B active per token) and takes 29.5 GB on disk; Swift-Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF has 27.3B (25.6B active) and takes 18.0 GB. Compare them layer by layer.

At a glance

lmstudio-community/Qwen3.8-27B-MLX-8bitukisai/Swift-Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF
Repo createdAug 14, 2026updated Aug 14, 2026Sep 11, 2026updated Sep 16, 2026
Model typeDenseHybrid attention: 48 linear + 16 full (GQA)DenseHybrid attention: 48 linear + 17 full (GQA)
InputsText + images461M vision encoderText + imagesvision encoder in a separate mmproj file, not counted here
Total parameters27.4Bsame27.3Bsame
Active per token25.6Bsame94% of the model25.6Bsame94% of the model
ExpertsNone (dense)None (dense)
Max context (from config)256K tokenssame256K tokenssame
Layers64same48 linear + 16 full attention64same48 linear + 17 full attention · plus 1 extra prediction layer
On disk29.5 GB1.6× more6 files18.0 GB1.6× less1 file
Precision8-bit MLX (91%), scales (5.7%), BF16 (3.1%)Q4_K (54%), Q6_K (45%), other (0.89%)
Quantization8-bit MLXgroups of 64 · 98% of parameters · vision encoder kept in BF16Q4_K_M (GGUF)mix of Q4_K, Q6_K · blocks of 256 · 100% of parameters
Fewest GPUs1× RTX 6000 Adaa single 48 GB card · weights only1× RTX 4090a single 24 GB card · weights only
Licenseapache-2.0swift-open-license-1.0 (custom)
GitHubNot linkedNot linked